Managing ETO complexity: how machine builders gain control from design to delivery

An engineering change discovered during assembly can cost ten times more than catching it in design. For machine builders, the difference between profit and loss often comes down to visibility: knowing where you are, what's changing, and what it means for delivery.

Every machine builder knows the scenario: a critical component arrives late, an engineering revision surfaces at the wrong moment, or a supplier change cascades through a 500-line bill of materials. These disruptions aren't theoretical risks. They represent the daily reality of building complex industrial machinery in a market that demands shorter lead times, greater customization, and tighter margins.

The mechanical engineering sector in Europe alone employs around three million people, with German mechanical engineering production expected to grow just 1% in 2026 after a difficult 2025 marked by a 5% decline. Trade conflicts, regulatory complexity, and rising costs are squeezing an industry already grappling with project timelines measured in months or years, not weeks. Machine builders face a choice: continue operating with systems built for simpler times, or invest in the capabilities that turn reactive firefighting into proactive orchestration.

This article examines how machine builders can gain control over engineering-to-order complexity by connecting the systems that manage design, production, and supply chain, turning fragmented visibility into coordinated execution.

The evolution of machine building: why automation is no longer enough

For decades, automation meant programming machines to repeat tasks with precision. A CNC machining center runs the same toolpath thousands of times. A welding robot executes the same sequence on every frame. This approach delivered enormous productivity gains, but it assumed a stable environment. Specifications didn't change mid-project. Suppliers delivered on time. Production volumes justified the engineering effort to automate.

Machine builders don't operate in that world anymore. The typical engineering-to-order (ETO) project involves hundreds of components, multiple engineering disciplines, and specifications that evolve throughout the contract. A packaging line for a food producer will be partly standard, partly customized, and partly designed from scratch for a unique product format. An automated warehouse system will need to integrate with legacy conveyors, new software platforms, and building constraints that weren't fully documented in the tender.

Consider the complexity: mechanical design creates the structural framework. Electrical engineering defines the power and control circuits. Software development writes the automation logic. Each discipline has its own tools, its own revision process, and its own timeline. A change in mechanical design might require electrical revisions, software updates, and new procurement specifications, but these dependencies aren't always visible until late in the project.

Traditional automation doesn't help when the engineering changes. It doesn't catch the misalignment between mechanical design, electrical layout, and control software. It doesn't flag that a long-lead-time component needs reordering because a customer revised the performance requirements.

What machine builders need isn't more automation on the shop floor. They need orchestration across the entire project lifecycle: systems that observe what's happening in engineering, procurement, and production, that identify conflicts before they become problems, and that adjust plans automatically when conditions change. The shift isn't about replacing human expertise; it's about augmenting it. Engineers still make design decisions. Project managers still coordinate with customers. But connected systems handle the relentless work of monitoring, recalculating, and alerting, so that humans can focus on the problems that require judgment, creativity, and customer relationships.

Managing complexity: variants, configurations, and deep bills of materials

A typical machine builder doesn't produce standard products. Every project involves some combination of standard modules, configured options, and custom engineering. A single machine might include mechanical assemblies, electrical systems, hydraulics, pneumatics, and software, each with its own engineering process, documentation, and supply chain.

The bill of materials for a complex machine can run to hundreds or thousands of lines, with multiple levels of sub-assemblies. Some components are purchased. Others are fabricated in-house. Still others are contracted to specialized suppliers who bring capabilities the machine builder doesn't maintain internally. Managing this complexity requires visibility that most ERP systems weren't designed to provide.

The challenge intensifies when specifications change, and in ETO environments, they always change. An engineering revision in the design phase might affect dozens of purchased parts. If the revision happens after procurement, some components may already be in transit or in inventory. If it happens during production, work in progress may need rework. Traditional systems track what's planned. Machine builders need systems that show what's current, what's changing, and what the downstream impacts will be.

Modern supply chain orchestration addresses this by connecting engineering, procurement, and production in real time. When a design changes, the system recalculates material requirements, identifies components that need reordering, and adjusts the production schedule accordingly. This isn't just automation, it's coordinated response: the system takes action based on business rules, escalating exceptions to human decision-makers while handling routine adjustments automatically.

Supply chain visibility for project-based manufacturing

Machine builders face a supply chain challenge fundamentally different from serial production. Components aren't consumed in steady flows but in project-specific batches. Lead times can stretch to months for specialized items like custom motors, precision bearings, or application-specific sensors. Supplier selection often happens per-project, based on technical requirements and delivery timing rather than annual contracts.

The question "where are we?" on any given project should be simple to answer. In practice, it requires correlating data from engineering (what's specified), procurement (what's ordered), logistics (what's in transit), and production (what's consumed). When this data lives in separate systems, often with different item numbering, different revision controls, and different update frequencies, answering the question takes hours or days of manual reconciliation.

By 2026, 75% of German manufacturing companies plan to invest in MES systems, recognizing that real-time shop floor data is essential for effective planning. But MES alone isn't enough. The value comes from connecting shop floor execution with upstream planning and downstream delivery promises. When a machine builder can see that a critical subassembly is behind schedule, they can make informed decisions: expedite procurement of dependent components, adjust the production sequence, or communicate proactively with the customer about delivery timing.

For machine builders, improved visibility translates to better delivery performance on projects where margin erosion from delays is a constant threat. A project delivered late isn't just a schedule problem; it's often a profitability problem, with liquidated damages, expedited shipping costs, and customer relationship damage.

Integrating engineering and production: the critical handoff

The handoff from engineering to production is where many ETO projects stumble. Design releases are incomplete. Drawings don't match the BOM. Engineering changes aren't communicated to the shop floor in time. Procurement orders parts based on preliminary specifications that are later revised.

These problems stem from disconnected systems. PLM manages design data. ERP manages materials and financials. MES manages production execution. Each system has its own data model, its own release process, and its own version of the truth. When they're not tightly integrated, discrepancies accumulate until someone discovers, usually at the worst possible moment, that the parts on hand don't match the current design.

The cost of late discovery is substantial. Engineering changes found in assembly can cost ten times more to correct than changes caught during design review. For a complex machine with a six-figure value, this means that a handful of late-discovered issues can consume the entire project margin. In extreme cases, rework costs can turn a profitable project into a loss.

Connected production, where engineering changes flow automatically from PLM to MES, and production feedback flows back to engineering, breaks this cycle. A design revision triggers updates across the system: new work instructions reach the shop floor, procurement receives updated requirements, and the production schedule adjusts to reflect the change. The goal isn't to eliminate engineering changes; that's unrealistic in ETO environments. The goal is to absorb changes efficiently, minimizing the disruption to execution.

Implications for IT: building an architecture that supports ETO

IT directors at machine builders face a particular challenge: enterprise software was largely designed for repetitive manufacturing, not project-based production. Standard ERP configurations assume stable BOMs, predictable demand, and standardized processes. ETO manufacturing has none of these characteristics.

The architecture that supports coordinated operations for machine builders needs specific capabilities. Configuration management must handle product variants without creating system sprawl. Project costing must track actuals against estimates at a granular level, by work order, by component, by labor hour. Scheduling must accommodate the dependencies and constraints of multi-phase projects, not just production orders that can be completed in hours or days.

The EU Machinery Regulation 2023/1230, which takes effect in January 2027, adds another dimension to IT planning. The new regulation requires machinery safety to account for digitalization, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. Control systems must be protected against both accidental failures and deliberate cyberattacks. Documentation must demonstrate cybersecurity robustness throughout the product lifecycle. For IT teams, this means security becomes a product feature, not just an infrastructure concern.

The practical approach is modular: select solutions designed for interoperability, that address specific pain points while connecting with the broader ecosystem. A modern MES should integrate with existing ERP without requiring a complete system replacement. Factory scheduling should complement PLM-driven engineering processes, not compete with them. Control tower capabilities should provide visibility across systems without creating another data silo that requires its own maintenance and integration effort.

Moving forward: practical steps for machine builders

The shift from fragmented operations to coordinated execution doesn't require a complete transformation. It starts with identifying the highest-value opportunities and building capabilities incrementally.

Assess visibility gaps. Can you answer the question "where are we on project X?" in minutes, or does it take days? Can you see the impact of an engineering change across procurement, production, and delivery commitments? Where data lives in disconnected systems, integration creates the foundation for more sophisticated capabilities.

Choose solutions designed for interoperability. The goal is to connect systems so that data flows automatically and decisions can be made with complete information. Look for solutions with proven integration capabilities: open APIs, standard data formats, and documented interfaces to PLM, ERP, and shop floor systems. Modular architecture matters, it means you can address specific pain points without disrupting what already works.

Start with the interfaces that cause friction. Not every integration has equal value. Focus first on the handoffs that create the most problems: PLM to ERP (engineering to procurement), ERP to MES (planning to execution), scheduling to shop floor. These are the connections where delayed or incorrect information causes rework, missed deliveries, and margin erosion.

Prepare for regulatory requirements. The January 2027 deadline for the EU Machinery Regulation isn't far away. If your machines include connected systems, AI-driven functions, or software safety components, the compliance requirements are changing. Cybersecurity risk assessments need to be part of the design process, not an afterthought added during final documentation.

Conclusion: from reacting to preventing

The machine building industry has always been defined by engineering excellence, the ability to design and build complex equipment that performs reliably in demanding environments. That excellence remains essential, the foundation on which everything else is built. What's changing is the context: faster project cycles, greater customization, tighter margins, and customers who expect transparent communication about project status and delivery timing.

The machine builders who thrive in the next decade won't necessarily be those with the most advanced automation on the shop floor. They'll be those who connect engineering, production, and supply chain into a coherent whole, where problems are prevented rather than discovered, and where every project benefits from real-time visibility across the entire value chain.

Control over ETO complexity isn't about eliminating variability. It's about seeing variability clearly, responding to it quickly, and absorbing it without letting it derail project profitability. That's the difference between machine builders who manage projects and those who are managed by them.

Ready to explore how integrated manufacturing operations can support your machine building business?

Discover how sedApta's Manufacturing Execution System and Factory Scheduling solutions help machine builders connect engineering, production, and supply chain operations.

Contact sedApta to discuss your specific challenges with our manufacturing operations specialists.