Data-Driven Transformation in Telco Operators | White Paper | Polystar
The Telecom Industry is facing a deep transformation. Read about the CSP status, as well as the drivers for transformation. Download here
How can telcos reduce AI hallucinations? Retrieval-Augmented Generation enhances accuracy with contextual data, enabling trusted, real-time network operations.
Inaccuracies generated by LLMs can have huge consequences – particularly for telecoms operators and service providers. Reducing the possibility of such mistakes is of critical importance. RAG can lend a helping hand – and also build new levels of protection to support Agentic-based autonomous operations. How? Through internal, curated knowledge bases.
Telecom operators and service providers depend on accuracy. Making the correct decision, with the best information available is critical. There’s nothing new in this, and it applies to many sectors, not only to telecoms – but with the growing adoption and maturity of Generative AI across operational systems and processes, the issue of accuracy has been thrown into sharp relief.
That’s not because AI is inherently inaccurate – far from it. Rather, it’s because even trusted AI can, occasionally, introduce errors. The problem is that it can be hard to spot such errors, which can lead to potentially catastrophic but well-intentioned decisions.
In our industry, this matters, because we must consider a number of factors that combine to mean accuracy is paramount. These include:
Complex, multi-technology, multi-generation, and multi-vendor operational systems
SLA-backed service delivery with little margin for error
Real-time service orchestration and management
Regulatory oversight with the power to impose stringent penalties and fines
Add these to the fact that telecoms networks constitute critical national infrastructure – and the impact of errors becomes of huge significance.
So, what’s to be done? If so-called naïve AI is not sufficient for industrial and safety-critical use cases, how can we reduce the possibility of such errors and deliver better outcomes?
That was the theme of our recent webinar “Agentic RAG – Smarter AI for Network Assurance”. During this live session, we discussed why such errors can emerge – and how we can mitigate them.
There are two main reasons. First, LLMs typically have a cut-off date, so they can only contain knowledge up to a given moment in time. After which, they are essentially frozen – until the next update.
Second, models have inherent confidence. So, they can provide information in a convincing manner, which is believable to humans – the phenomenon of hallucinating.
There’s another factor, too. LLMs rely on public data and may not have access to specific, contextual information that is important to your business. Every operator has a unique mix of systems, vendor solutions, integrations and more. Even if operational principles are common, the OSS, BSS and connectivity fabric will be unique.
As a result, LLMs that have only access to public information cannot apply contextual knowledge to the outputs they generate or make answers specific to your situation and protocols. Consequently, errors can occur – and while most will be inconsequential, some could have a profound negative impact on service performance and operations.
How do we solve this problem? Retraining the LLM is an option – but that’s costly and takes time. While it may push the knowledge forward, that same knowledge will also be left behind quite quickly by events. That’s not helpful when you are running a network and things change all the time – even daily.
Another answer is to leverage RAG – Retrieval-Augmented Generation. RAG is a well-established principle but is now attracting renewed attention, because it has the potential to blend private and contextual knowledge, in a controlled manner, with the trained data held in an LLM.
In practice, this means that your internal knowledge – documents, processes, specifications, user manuals and more – can be made accessible to and then used by your LLMs when you make queries via its prompt. This contextual information helps LLMs give you better, more accurate answers.
To accomplish this, we need to build an architecture that enables new information from this knowledge base to be retrieved when questions are put to the LLM. The knowledge base effectively becomes part of the query workflow and is available to the LLM, but not part of it. This means an extra second or two in response times, but that sacrifice is more than compensated for by the enhanced accuracy.
And, when the answer comes, it will also be supported by citations that show you how and from where it was derived. Better still, you can continually update your knowledge base with dynamic data that reflects the current state of the art – so it’s always fresh and relevant.
The webinar showcased just such an architecture and how it could be realized in practice. That means a model in which we have a RAG backend for the LLM that allows us to load and process the documents we need for our internal knowledge base.
In essence, this is our catalogue – to which we can add through manual or automated processes the information that we need to augment LLM queries. The data supplied is converted to chunks that can then be mapped and categorized in a database – ready for retrieval.
Alongside the RAG backend, we need an augmentation layer in which these chunks, organized in a manner accessible to the chosen LLM. In turn, the LLM can then retrieve the relevant information in response to prompt-based questions, taking into account user intent.
The chunks represent private knowledge that is contextual to your business and operations, so they answers provided are refined based on this – referenced – output, providing the enhanced accuracy we seek.
Enhancing accuracy is a necessary step to enhance the trustworthiness of LLMs. RAG provides a means to achieve this. But as we also move towards Agentic-based, autonomous operations, it also provides a means to support the extended governance and oversight we will need to safeguard networks and critical services.
Agentic AI operations, are of course, likely to drive the next wave of automation in telecoms networks. Agentic-enabled processes will be able to exchange information and to execute decisions based on the information available.
Once again, we face the risk that hallucinations could lead to inaccuracy – with the additional risk that the inaccuracies could result in erroneous actions that could disrupt the network if left unchecked.
The addition of RAG provides a layer of contextualized governance that can reduce the possibility of such errors. Just as it enhances information retrieval, so too can it provide greater accuracy to other agents that need the same information.
However, here, we can also limit the extent to which different RAG agents are permitted access to different chunks of data. We can retain user rights and permission policies that are applicable to people and implement the same oversight and safeguards for autonomous systems.
In other words, we can implement strict governance controls that mean agents do not exceed their authority – and ensure human interventions for decisions that could have critical impact. Agents cannot simply have unfettered access to information or the ability to make any decision.
In the context of telecoms networks, RAG can do much to provide the necessary context to refine and enhance information retrieval by LLMs. But it can also support Agentic deployments, building a layer of protection into the automation fabric that is subject to the same controls as are applicable to human operatives.
We’re taking the first steps along this pathway, but it’s already clear that the established principles of RAG can do much to support operational safety concerns.
Watch the complete webinar on-demand to explore our RAG innovations in more detail.
AI applications that leverage LLMs offer much promise and are already delivering benefits. However, there are a few issues that may limit or impair the ways in which they can help. First, LLMs are trained on a specific (although wide-ranging) data set. In essence, there’s a cutoff point, so they cannot use information that emerges subsequent to that point unless and until they are retrained – an expensive and time-consuming activity.
Second, the most relevant data to support AI-driven operations may not, in fact, be in the public domain – and hence never accessible to the LLM. This includes information specific to your business and operations.
RAG helps us to address both limitations – by enabling continuous updates to the information set and to use your specific and private data to provide contextualised responses that consider your unique operations.
This should include any operating manuals, workflows, user manuals, processes, specifications, and internal documentation and governance. It’s up to you – as it’s your data.
The specific details of any SLA need to be considered when determining actions and outcomes for service assurance. KPIs that track SLA drive both responses and escalation paths. None of that information is available to the LLM – but it can be captured in your private knowledge base. So, you can provide context that helps determine the right responses.
Governance and access control are fundamental requirements for any telecom AI deployment, particularly when AI agents are allowed to recommend or execute actions. In an Agentic RAG architecture, access policies can be applied not only to users but also to AI agents.
This means different agents can be granted access only to the data, systems, and workflows relevant to their specific roles. Sensitive operational procedures, customer data, network configurations, and automation capabilities can be restricted according to predefined permissions and business policies.
In addition, approval workflows and human-in-the-loop controls can be introduced for actions that may have significant operational or business impact. By combining role-based access control, auditability, and policy enforcement with contextual knowledge retrieval, Agentic RAG helps ensure that AI-driven decisions remain transparent, governed, and aligned with organizational requirements.
Yes. One of the key advantages of RAG is that your private operational knowledge remains under your control. Rather than embedding sensitive business information directly into the LLM, it is stored within your organization’s managed knowledge repositories and retrieved only when needed to answer a specific query.
This approach helps organizations maintain control over proprietary documents, network procedures, operational workflows, governance policies, and other sensitive information. Access permissions can be enforced at both the user and agent levels, ensuring that only authorized entities can retrieve specific information.
In addition, organizations can apply their existing security, compliance, and data governance policies to the RAG knowledge base, helping them meet regulatory requirements while still benefiting from AI-driven insights and automation.